The Jurassic World 3: Reign, which I have been waiting for a long time this cycle, opened in grand style.

The first day (June 10) box office of 102 million, although compared to the box office of “Jurassic World 2” 202 million shrunk by half, but since last year “Fast and Furious 9” since the only first day box office of more than 100 million introduced movies. Watching blockbusters is the audience’s immediate need, and movies like Jurassic World 3 have been absent from cinemas for too long, so even though I know that word of mouth isn’t working, I still don’t hesitate to contribute to the box office.

After all, it’s good to have something to watch.

Probably with extremely low expectations, Jurassic World 3 is not as bad as I thought it would be. After all, it is $165 million smashed out, after all, the first five protagonists have arrived, after all, digital dinosaurs are all over the screen, the base score is still there. It is even better than “Jurassic World 2”, but there is still a gap compared to “World 1”. The main thing is that the first episode of the story line is more focused and continuous, unlike the third so chaotic set.

First of all, let’s talk about the advantages.

The sense of a big film is really out, the amount of special effects is too much, just fear that the audience feel the loss. Our story may not work, but it’s definitely worth the price of admission.

And compared to “World 1” 150 million and “World 2” 170 million budget, “World 3” 165 million and no additional costs, but stuffed more dinosaurs, bigger scenes, but also invited back the “Park Trilogy” star, it shows that the money used in the audience visible blade, worthy of praise.

Then to the so-called “grand finale” well, nostalgic elements full of, if you have not seen the “park trilogy” and sometimes even a little connected. But for the audience who have seen the previous film is very friendly, the classic elements of the series all tribute again, the details are almost all eggs.

When the two generations of the main actors reunited, and even a little “three spiders in the same frame” the excitement of breaking the next dimensional wall. In fact, it is not necessary to watch a movie to say that it is worth watching only when it has a high reputation, “Jurassic World 3” so that in a specific context can bring the audience touched, it is already very valuable.

Then there is the action element has been improved, which is represented by the Malta car chase and glacier run, the action design is thrilling and smooth, reaching the level of A-class production should be.

Although looking at it, I feel to Universal’s “Fast and Furious” style on the deviation, is not new, but such scenes appear in the “Jurassic series”, it is a bit interesting – – at least in the previous film on the basis of the addition of the previous film. -At least it adds a whole new spectacle to the previous film.

These points make me feel that the ticket money is not in vain, and more than two hours of time is not a waste.

Then there are the drawbacks.

The second half of the main group of eight people, not counting the villain Dodgson, shot the “Avengers” combined feeling.

And the first generation of the trio is not just a simple fight, each person has a complete story line. The first half of the camera switches back and forth between them, cutting the narrative into pieces and chaos.

This is not even a two-line or three-line narrative problem, originally bound Claire and Owen in the plane crash and then split two lines you dare to believe it. The role is also very obvious, is that each encountered another dinosaur attack, the introduction of a richer scene.

This is again caught in the “three bugs in the same frame” type of trap, in order to create scenes to write the script, rather than around the storytelling itself.

Including the gene-edited locusts, should not want to fall into the deadly cycle of dinosaur escape in every part, but this crisis has no end and no end at all.

So the scenes and scenes between the excesses become very stiff, is to lead to the next plot point of the transition, the text scene are like the opening scene Claire told the clone Macy “very unique” as awkward.

Simply put, it does not stand up to scrutiny.

The series is 29 years old, the first “Jurassic Park” is a landmark film, whether the concern about the use of technology, or “life will always find a way out” assertion, are very thought-provoking.

Park 1 was the first film to be shot with computer effects on a large scale. Previously, such monster movies were all shot with models, and digital technology only appeared sporadically in pioneering films like Terminator 2.

After “Jurassic Park”, filmmakers knew that the imagination of their brains could be realized through digital technology, which almost changed the whole way of creation in Hollywood.

But in addition to the debut, the sequel was mostly reduced to a thrilling monster-escaping movie. Can not say bad, but the value is limited, especially in contrast with the epoch-making “Jurassic Park”.

Now the six-part series finally draws a halt, although “Jurassic World 3” has one problem or another, but it is still considered a story, the six-part series encapsulated into a decent complete series.

And I do not believe that Universal will stop here, except that the reboot is expected to change a group of lead actors, a different story. By the time Owen and Claire and then back to guest star, memories to kill again to harvest again.

Well, I have thought about it for Universal.